Many in the politcal arena would compare compuslive heath care coverage to that of required automobile insurance. So let’s do that.
Health Care Insurance Reform is in the books. No one is quite sure what they will get or what it will cost, but it does seem that most feel that something like it should be done.
Why not for automobile insurance? We should require that everyone buy the insurance (whether they have a car or not), we should certainly require that regardless of their previous driving history (pre-existing conditions) that insurance companies should cover them (and their 26 year old children).
Certainly we should continue to cover them regardless of how bad their driving record gets.
These may seem like ludicrous comparisons, but, are they? Why would we turn someone down because of some unfortunate accidents but protect their coverage due to unfortunate health conditions? Neither are controllable? Both will require that others bare their burden.
The U.S. Senate voted to advance President Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill" to debate, clearing an…
The Trump administration is cracking down on government leakers and curbing the flow of classified…
Alan Dershowitz weighed in on Fox Business Friday on the ongoing battle between the executive…
Radio host Hugh Hewitt said Friday on Fox News’ “Hannity” that he believes Miami will…
The United States’ recent confrontations with Iran dominate the headlines, but the growing, if quieter,…
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk appeared on Fox News Friday to discuss what he…