Categories: Opinion

"progressives" Revise History…Again

Thanks to the energy of the Tea Party, the 2010 midterm elections established a mandate for reducing the size and scope of government by way of spending cuts. Evidence of this mandate is readily found in the record number of anti big government Republicans who replaced ”progressive” Democrats in the House of Representatives. It’s also important to note that newly elected proponents for smaller government ended a filibuster proof majority held by ”progressive” Democrats in the Senate.

Over the past twelve months, forked tongued, two faced pathological liars in the White House, Congress and OWS; hugely aided and abetted by the “progressive” Party Pravda; have revised history to fictionalize that the 2010 election mandate was simply to balance the budget.

According to “progressives”, balancing the budget “fairly” requires increased taxes on the rich. It matters not to “progressives” that such a tax will have next to zero impact on America’s budget problems, which are directly caused by excessive deficit spending which will continue to vastly exceed any amount collected by new taxes on the wealthy. It matters even less that America has historically been the land of opportunity, and that such taxes are counter productive to America’s being the best place on earth for the possibility of economic advancement.

“progressives” assail Conservatives for defending Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy, while resisting attempts to extend payroll tax cuts for average American workers. Never mind that the Bush era tax cuts apply to all income brackets, including that of the average American worker. Forget that the payroll tax is what funds that untouchable holy grail of ”progressive” politics: Social Security. “progressives” are willfully choosing to de-fund Social Security by extending the payroll tax cuts. They will continue to lie, twisting and distorting reality about what’s causing America’s budget woes and about the cure.

Why do “progressives” want seniors to face economic hardship due to reduced Social Security benefits? Why do “progressives” want seniors to eat dog food?

For political gain, nothing more.

https://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/progressives-revise-history-again/

Rich Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the editor-in-chief of Conservative Daily News and the president of Bald Eagle Media, LLC. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Bald Eagle Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and GETTR

Share
Published by
Rich Mitchell

Recent Posts

Socialism Illustrated

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” -…

5 hours ago

President Donald Trump’s Schedule for Thursday, May 1, 2026

Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will have executive time, receive a briefing, and travel to…

5 hours ago

Trump Nominates Dr. Nicole Saphier as Surgeon General, Tapping Breast Cancer Expert to Lead Nation’s Public Health Efforts

President Donald Trump announced Thursday that he is nominating Dr. Nicole B. Saphier, a board-certified…

8 hours ago

School Officer Stops Armed Teenager Before He Enters Building

A 16-year-old former student armed with a handgun was stopped before he entered a Daytona…

8 hours ago

The Democratic Party is Not Reflective of Maine

The news was welcome this morning as Governor Janet Mills has withdrawn from her quest…

8 hours ago

Oil Hits Four Year High As Iran Negotiations Continue

Oil briefly hit $126.41 a barrel early Thursday as market volatility tied to the Iranian…

8 hours ago