Categories: Trending Commentary

Misrepresenting The “Fetal Heartbeat” Texas Bill

Geoff Livingston (CC)

 Certain parts of the Internet went started frothing at the mouth on Thursday and Friday over another Texas abortion bill. Think Progress wrote, Republicans were looking “criminalize abortion services after a fetal heartbeat can be detected.” Huffington Post wrote the glaring headline, “Six-Week Abortion Ban Introduced In Texas.” Salon said the bill would “face harsh criticism and fierce opposition from the thousands of Texans rallying against the Republican-controlled Legislature’s efforts to eliminate access to safe abortion care in the state.” Raw Story had a similar post.

 There are two problems with how House Bill 59 is being characterized:

  1. The bill won’t be debated this year: Republican State Representative Phil King released a statement saying there aren’t any hearings planned on the measure, and the bill won’t be considered until January 2015.

  2. The bill will probably never be law: The key text of the bill can be found in Section Two, where it says the subchapter can’t be enforced until the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade; a federal or state court restores, expands or clarifies the authority the states have on abortion; or an amendment to the U.S. Constitution is passed restoring, expanding or clarifying the authority the states have on abortion.

 The Supreme Court isn’t expected to decide on abortion ever again, and it’s unlikely a Constitutional amendment will ever be passed. To Think Progress and Salon’s credit, they have edited their stories to point out Section Two of the bill. HuffPost and Raw Story have not.

 Similar outrage happened with Texas House Bill 2, where opponents claimed all abortion would be banned after 20 weeks and almost all abortion clinics in Texas would have to close. However, Subsection 171.046 says abortion can be done if “in the physician’s reasonable medical judgment,” there is a condition that affects the woman’s health or the child has severe fetal abnormality. Section 11, part b gives clinics until September 2014 to meet the new standards or else they won’t be allowed to perform abortions.

 It’s understandable the abortion issue (and any social issue) causes a ton of emotion. But people need to be armed with the facts, before debating the merits of a particular bill or law. If they don’t, then there’s no point to any debate because it will only end in harsh words, hurt feelings and damaged relationships.

Taylor Millard

Share
Published by
Taylor Millard

Recent Posts

Best Nontoxic, Organic, Safe and Cheap Weed Control for Yard and Garden

Weeds. Those freeloaders of the garden world. No matter how lovingly you tend your tomatoes…

6 hours ago

Donald Trump’s Schedule for Monday, May 19, 2025

Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will sign a bill into law, participate in a law…

14 hours ago

President Trump, Melania Issue Statement On Joe Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

President Donald Trump said in a Sunday social media post that he and First Lady…

14 hours ago

Congress Calls On Prestigious University To End CCP-Linked School Allegedly Leaking ‘Sensitive’ Data

The House Committee on Education and Workforce and the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist…

22 hours ago

Top Trump Military Official Takes Aim At Absurd Bloat In Navy

U.S. Navy Secretary John Phelan took aim at the rampant waste in the Navy during…

22 hours ago

Cell Phone Titans Clash With Cable Companies, Pentagon Over Cruz-Backed Idea For ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’

An $88 billion tug-of-war over America’s airwaves is pitting the Pentagon against telecom giants —…

22 hours ago