The FBI Gives A New Meaning To The Principle Of “Double Jeopardy”

Back before the 2016 presidential election, the FBI agent who oversaw the Hillary email investigation was also in charge of the initial Trump collusion investigation, and he found there to be “no there, there” related to a problem with Russia, and this finding was in spite of the express desire of the investigator to keep Trump out of the White House.

Nevertheless, after Trump became president, the collusion charges were reinstated and a special counsel was appointed to retrace old grounds. But after an additional year of investigations by the Special Counsel, there has still been no evidence of a Trump/Russia collusion, and we know that the leftist’s charge of obstruction of justice for the firing of James Comey is a complete crock of crap.

Leftists in government have created a new form of double jeopardy exclusively for Donald Trump: if they can’t find him guilty once, on charges on which they want to indict him, they’ll hand the investigation off to another form of prosecution and start the same old investigation all over again. Isn’t there a prohibition against double jeopardy in our constitution?

This unconstitutional persecution of a president that the main-line, Washington, liberal establishment doesn’t like, and the overlapping denial to the American voter of his and her elected presidential representative, must halt, immediately.