I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Happy Easter from Minnesota! Coming together, the real meaning of Easter is about the torture,…
Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will participate in the White House Egg Roll on Monday.…
China is reaching out to the world to make trade deals amid President Donald Trump’s…
On the road to Damascus, Saul of Tarsus, who we would later come to know…
Zuckerberg says he regrets that Meta bowed to Biden administration pressure to censor content, saying…
This is what Easter is all about. The Death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, much…