Customs, Border and Immigration News

Mollie Hemingway Breaks Down The Pros And Cons Of Shutting Down The Southern Border

Senior Editor for The Federalist, Mollie Hemingway, tackled the pros and cons of President Donald Trump’s proposal to close the southern border on “Fox & Friends” Wednesday.

“The idea behind shutting down the border, there would be two issues there. One, there are so many people flowing over the border — there are so many people flowing across the parts of border that are not currently guarded, that they need to shutdown the ports of entry to monitor those areas, and also the flow of drugs there,” she said.

Hemingway said people may be more inclined to help solve the border crisis if they are given an economic incentive to do so.

“The other issue is that sometimes you want to have a little bit of hurt so that people are incentivized to do something about the situation,” she continued. “That’s true not just in this country but in other countries. And facing economic consequences for not taking this problem seriously, or not doing enough to stop it, is one of the ways that you can make people care more about it.”

“In this country though, where we should be most concerned, there are things that our legislatures should be doing — closing loopholes. We have laws that incentivize trafficking children. They’re having children come as unaccompanied minors or knowing that if people come with children they kind of get a free entry into the country. These are things that our lawmakers should be worried about right now.”

Hemingway also said America’s elite is less effected by open border policies and then accused them of shirking their duties in favor of complacency.

“For a lot of people, a lot of elite people don’t face the negative consequences of a porous border the way that the rest of the country does. And this really is a bipartisan problem going back decades,” she said.

“We have known these problems were coming. We have known this crisis is looming. But we just don’t have very serious people who are willing to make tough decisions to enforce rule of law or spend the money or change the laws that are necessary to change the situation. And even the fact that there’s a humanitarian crisis or other problems does not seem to motivate people.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Nick Givas

Share
Published by
Nick Givas

Recent Posts

Da’ (Hammond) Bears

The Chicago Bears are keeping their name, but Indiana is paying for the new stadium,…

8 hours ago

U.S. Treasury Department Moves to Redirect Iranian Assets for Gulf Allies’ War Damage Repairs

In a significant escalation of economic pressure on Tehran amid ongoing regional hostilities, the U.S.…

9 hours ago

Freedom of Speech Does Not Mean You Can Ignore the Facts, Nor Change Them

If you listen to the words of Democrats, you would think they all still dress…

9 hours ago

Late Ballot Dumps May Just Put Socialist Over Republican Days After Election

The likelihood of Socialist Democrat Nithya Raman being elected Los Angeles’s next mayor is surging…

9 hours ago

Spy Agencies Have Exploded In Size. Trump’s Intel Chiefs Are The First To Downsize

Since the FBI’s founding at the turn of the century, the intelligence community has grown…

9 hours ago

Now That The House Has Voted To Rein In Trump’s War With Iran, What Happens Next?

The House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution Wednesday to rein in President Donald…

1 day ago