Opinion

Biden Is Covering Up True Price Tag of Infrastructure Plan, Experts Warn

President Biden’s just-released infrastructure proposal takes a “go big or go home” approach. Its various provisions have been tallied at $2 to $2.25 trillion in total cost, with less than half of that spending going to actual transportation infrastructure—hundreds of billions are instead funneled to “racial and environmental justice,” crony corporate subsidies, public schools, and more.

But experts are speaking out to warn that the true cost of Biden’s bill is likely significantly higher than the (already-massive) $2+ trillion price tag.

The administration calculated its plan’s cost over an 8-year time period when legislation is usually evaluated using a 10-year timeline. This means the real cost is potentially 20 percent higher. So, too, the plan advertises many of the expenditures as “temporary” but they would likely become permanent, further raising the true cost beyond the advertised sticker price.

At least, that’s what Mercatus Center economist Robert Krol told Fox Business

“It may have lowered the total cost of the plan, the total dollar amount,” Krol said of the Biden administration’s methods. “But that’s real shaky, because a lot of this stuff is going to be permanent. In my view, whether it’s eight years or 10 years, my guess would be it’ll understate the cost over time.”

Meanwhile, Cato Institute economist Chris Edwards says the real cost of the plan is likely closer to $2.75 trillion. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget similarly ran the numbers and projected the true cost at $2.65 trillion. 

At first glance, this may sound like splitting hairs. Unfortunately, profligate federal spending is now so common that figures in the trillions don’t have a lot of meaning for most people. But the difference between $2.25 trillion and $2.75 trillion is $500 billion. That’s a lot of money—$3,500 per federal taxpayer, in fact. 

If President Biden wants to force through this bloated and wasteful spending package that has little to do with actual infrastructure, he should at least be honest with Americans about its true cost and argue on its merits. Instead, he’s trying to slip thousands extra out of the average federal taxpayer’s pocket without them noticing.

This article was originally published on FEE.org

Brad Polumbo

Share
Published by
Brad Polumbo

Recent Posts

A Savvy Shopper’s Secrets for Buying in Bulk: How to Tell a Bum Deal from a Real Steal

Buying in bulk is an article of faith in these cost-conscious times, and judging by…

11 hours ago

Rare Sightings

Will the last moderate Democrat turn out the lights? If there is such a thing,…

12 hours ago

Canada Makes Bizarre US Trade Talk Demand: No More Memes

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s administration needs to “stop…

22 hours ago

Russian Hackers Claim They Released Data Stolen From ATF In Cyberattack

A Russian cybergang published data it claimed to have stolen during an August cyberattack on…

22 hours ago

Pentagon Will Own 35% Of Venezuela Oil Venture, White House Reveals

The Pentagon will hold a 35% ownership share of a new oil company created through…

22 hours ago

Worldwide Indicator Flashing Red As Global Debt Deluge Spooks Investors

Global bond yields climbed to their highest levels since the 2008 financial crisis Tuesday as…

22 hours ago