The federal mask mandate on planes, trains and public transportation never was about “the science.” It was about politics.

No wonder then that U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle of the Middle District of Florida tossed the mandate in a 59-page ruling Monday.

At this moment, it is not clear if the Department of Justice will seek an emergency stay. In a way, it doesn’t matter. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Once you’ve told mask-resistant Americans they don’t have to fog up their glasses when they fly, it’s over.

If the mandate had been about science, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would have followed the Administrative Procedure Act and conducted notice and comment procedures to examine the real-world consequences of the Feb. 3, 2021, rule.

Experts would have welcomed the input of stakeholders who would have had a chance to voice concerns and suggestions. Tweaks could have been made. Instead, it was an edict.

“The flexing of administrative power,” attorney Glenn Roper of the Pacific Legal Foundation called it. Last year, Pacific Legal won a challenge against a CDC-ordered nationwide ban on evictions — another power grab because of COVID-19.

There was a time when COVID-19 was new and unknown. The public understood why bureaucrats might overreact — better safe than sorry.

Two years later, it’s hard to show faith in a bureaucracy that hasn’t even bothered to distinguish between mostly-for-show masks and more effective face coverings, such as N95s. Compliance apparently was the goal.

A chart by Ian Miller of the Brownstone Institute compares caseloads in states with and without mask mandates. Essentially, the chart shows no significant difference between states with or without mandates.

The Brownstone Institute is a think tank formed in response to “the global crisis created by policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020.” The most egregious example: extended school closures that harmed far more children than they helped.

When reasonable voices pushed for targeted protections for the vulnerable while allowing the country to “resume life as normal” — I’m quoting from the Oct. 4, 2020, Great Barrington Declaration — they were dismissed as anti-science goofballs.

The goofballs were right, and the experts were too slow to figure it out.


Copyright 2022 Creators.com

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders is a fellow at the Discovery Institute's Chapman Center for Citizen Leadership. Contact her at dsaunders@discovery.org.

Share
Published by
Debra J. Saunders

Recent Posts

What The UAE’s OPEC Breakup Actually Signifies

In a move that should surprise no one who’s been paying attention to the shifting…

8 hours ago

As Iran War Oil Stranglehold Continues, Another Crisis Brews

While the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continues to drag on alongside the Iran…

8 hours ago

4 Fed Members Send Jerome Powell Out To Pasture By Bucking Him On Final Interest Rate Decision

Four committee members dissented Wednesday from the Federal Reserve’s statement to keep the central bank’s…

8 hours ago

Babies’ Screen Time Hits Dangerous Highs, New Study Shows

Over 70% of children under the age of two use screens for up to several…

14 hours ago

Fertile Ground

Assassination attempts, riots, and the rhetoric that inspires them, all coming from one side, the…

14 hours ago

National Security Watchdog Sounds Alarm On Dangers Lying Behind Crypto

A national security group is calling on Congress to treat cryptocurrency as a national security…

19 hours ago