Categories: In The News

Why the NY Outdoor Smoking Ban Should Matter to Everyone

Years ago when the ban of smoking near entrances to building took hold, you were warned.  Either help the smokers or you will be next.

Am I advocating smoking?  Of course not.  But as a true Conservative, the freedoms of the individual are central to my decision making processes.  I certainly agree that they don’t have the right to smoke in your face or in close proximity to you – and most wouldn’t.  Now, New York Mayor Michael (build the Mosque at Ground Zero) Bloomberg is pressing for regulations that would make it illegal to smoke in .. public open-air areas.  These areas include parks, beaches, boardwalks and pedestrian plazas (that could mean just about anything) like Times Square.

Certainly everyone can get on board with this right?  I mean .. seriously, let’s eliminate smoking everywhere.  Cars next, then your own home.  There is no reason for you to get involved in stopping this because it’s good for the country .. or something.  It promotes a healthier lifestyle .. it cleans the air for others .. it .. well, that’s pretty much it.  So why would anyone, other than smokers, oppose such a ban?  Perhaps because your vice is next.

Alcohol will most-likely be next.  They can’t prohibit it (everything becomes fashionable again at some point) without a Constitutional amendment, but they can tax the living crap out of it, restrict it’s use to a small closet in the back of your house, or refuse to let you into the government health care insurance exchange if you choose to imbibe – which you will if this administration keeps at its craptastic policies.

Once alcohol has been turned into the evil monster, they’ll attack sodas .. wait .. that’s already happening.  Next!

Tsarina Michelle is already attacking meat, salt, fast food and anything else that tastes good.  Wait until they outlaw good tasting food.

What after that?  Video games?  Blogging? Internet use? TV watching?  All of those things may make us less productive Americans so why wouldn’t the government want to limit how much time we spend doing those things or wholly prevent them?

If we don’t fight the oppressive, intrusive government elitists at each attempt to dictate to us what we should or should not do, a freedom we cherish will be next on the chopping block.  Those who have already lost theirs due to our inaction .. will feel no compunction to help us in our fight.

Rich Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the editor-in-chief of Conservative Daily News and the president of Bald Eagle Media, LLC. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Bald Eagle Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and GETTR

Share
Published by
Rich Mitchell

Recent Posts

Democrats Vote To Keep Government Shuttered in Hopes to Make Taxpayers Pay for Benefits for Illegal Aliens

Almost all Senate Democrats voted down a bipartisan effort to reopen the government on Tuesday…

2 hours ago

ROFL: Elizabeth Warren Lays Out What She’ll Do If Trump Sends Troops To Massachusetts

Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren said on Bloomberg Tuesday that she would fight back if President…

2 hours ago

Jerome Powell Suggests Fed Is On Track To Cut Interest Rates Once Again

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell suggested Tuesday that the central bank may be on track…

2 hours ago

SCOTUS May End ‘Disastrous’ Legal Standards Forcing States To Draw Congressional Districts Just For Minorities

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday in a case that could end the…

2 hours ago

ICE Partners with Oklahoma Highway Patrol to Capture 120 illegal aliens, 91 driving with CDL Licenses

OKLAHOMA CITY — From Sept. 22-25, ICE officers joined the Oklahoma Highway Patrol for a…

2 hours ago

Defense Titan Unveils Massive Helmet Upgrade For Troops Straight From Sci-Fi

The next generation of combat helmets could be on the horizon for America’s warfighters, blending…

5 hours ago