Obama Admits His Iran Agreement Is A No Good, Very Bad Deal. And This Is The Legacy He Wants?

When Obama began the Iranian Nuke talks he stated that a bad deal would be better than no deal.  At the time there were three types of outcomes to the negotiations:

Good Deal-Iran could agree that their development of a nuclear weapon was a bad idea and they would immediately stop and step into the 21st Century.

Bad Deal-Iran would be allowed to develop a Nuke with some restrictions and delays.

No Deal-The United States would walk away from the table with no deal (like Reagan did at Reykjavik when dealing with the Soviets).  But because Barry is a big shot he won’t even consider this type of deal, even though the sanctions on Iran could be increased to a point that would strangle them, world opinion would be against them, they wouldn’t have the money to support terrorism around the world and they would probably not have the money to further develop a weapon, even clandestinely on the cheap, as their economy deteriorated.

By Obama’s own statements he has made a bad deal with Iran, one that allows the Mullahs to continue to develop weapons, gives them billions of dollars that will allow them to further fund terrorism and murder around the world and gives them prestige with their evil buds because the Iranians stared at Kerry and Obama and our guys blinked. Obama is too wrapped up in his own importance to realize that a bad deal is much worse that no deal, and the future will hold bad surprises because of the stupidity of our beloved president.

So now Barry joins Neville Chamberlain and his “peace in our time” mocking, dreadful legacy, with Obama’s “bad deal in our time” folly of a legacy.  And our idiot president struts and preens like he thinks he’s really cool and accomplished.  He has no idea how ridiculous he looks, and like Neville Chamberlain (who was also too cool for school after his deal with Hitler) he’ll be mocked by future generations for his no good, very bad deal and his total lack of judgement.