Science, Technology, and Social Media

Facebook Changes Course, Says It Won’t Separate News Feed After All

 

by Eric Lieberman

Facebook announced Thursday it no longer plans on altering its News Feed by having one for friends and family then another for sponsored content.

Businesses and organizations heavily reliant on Facebook’s promotional capabilities have been concerned with the experiment because by separating content from brands and publishers by placing it in an “Explore” feed, those entities would naturally get less exposure.

Creating a “pay to play” virtual ecosystem would likely have, for example, forced publishers to purchase real estate on the platform, after years of startups in various industries organically growing essentially free of charge.

“You gave us our answer: People don’t want two separate feeds,” Head of News Feed Adam Mosseri wrote in a company blog post after some feedback. “In surveys, people told us they were less satisfied with the posts they were seeing, and having two separate feeds didn’t actually help them connect more with friends and family.”

It is just another initiative Facebook is ditching. Tech companies, especially the highly successful and powerful ones like Facebook, inherently encourage innovation. And that often means a failure or two will occur along the way — something Facebook seems not completely opposed to.

“We constantly try out new features, design changes and ranking updates to understand how we can make Facebook better for everyone,” Mosseri added. “Some of these changes — like Reactions, Live Video and GIFs — work well and go on to become globally available. Others don’t and we drop them.”

Facebook announced in December it was ditching one of its anti-“fake news” initiatives and focusing more on another. The tech giant specifically said it would jettison its “Disputed Flags” program, which instituted indicator warnings for potentially fraudulent or misleading information in certain articles seen on the trending news sidebar or users’ news feeds.

The decision stemmed from academic research, which showed “that putting a strong image, like a red flag, next to an article may actually entrench deeply held beliefs — the opposite effect to what” it intended.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

DCNF

Share
Published by
DCNF
Tags: Facebook

Recent Posts

‘Kremlin’s Puppet’ Leadership Shifts Weeks After Trump Admin Threat

Global commodities firm Gunvor Group announced that its CEO is stepping down amid a management-led…

3 hours ago

If Young People Want More Affordability, They Should Get A Job

Polls show that the age-group of Americans most worried about “affordability” are the 20 and…

3 hours ago

FBI Still Reeks Of Trump Derangement Syndrome Months Into Second Admin, Report Finds

Nearly a year into President Donald Trump’s second term, deep resistance to his agenda persists…

6 hours ago

Tim Walz Admits Welfare State ‘Attracts Criminals,’ Dodges Blame For Fraud Problem

Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said his state “attracts criminals” when asked Sunday about rampant…

6 hours ago

Appeals Court Upholds Decision Disqualifying Alina Habba

A federal appeals court upheld a decision Monday finding Alina Habba is disqualified from serving…

6 hours ago

Female Mamdani Running To Replace DC’s Longtime Mayor

D.C. Council member Janeese Lewis George, a self-avowed democratic socialist, announced Monday she will run…

6 hours ago