Trending Commentary

Does a two-track security clearance process make sense?

I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:

First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.

Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.

The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.

Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?

Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?

John Lucas

Share
Published by
John Lucas

Recent Posts

Teachers Union Head Gleefully Declares That Her Union Owns American Children

Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) president Stacy Davis Gates said on Monday that “all children belong…

5 hours ago

Trump Admin Green-Lights Migrant Detention Facility Guarded By Alligators

The Trump administration is funding a project in Florida that seeks to turn an airfield…

5 hours ago

Lisa Murkowski Says She Has Considered Caucusing With Dems

Republican Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski toyed with the idea of caucusing with Democrats on Monday,…

5 hours ago

Trump DOJ Sues Judges On Entire Federal District Court

The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the entire federal district court of Maryland on Tuesday.…

6 hours ago

Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Trump To Keep Throwing Money At EV Chargers

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from withholding billions of dollars in…

6 hours ago

More Voters Deciding They’d Rather Be Called Anything But A Democrat

A growing share of Americans are ditching the Democratic Party as it suffers one of…

6 hours ago