I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Some may think that title to be a bit crude, but I contend that there…
House Democrats declared war Wednesday on Democratic Texas congressional candidate Maureen Galindo, who stated she…
Billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s liberal son, James Murdoch, is acquiring three major divisions of…
The Department of War announced Tuesday that it will reduce the number of troops present…
Two Los Angeles firefighters suffered minor injuries Tuesday evening after a fire truck lost control…
One of the world’s largest human composting facilities just opened near the nation’s capital, according…