I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Tim Walz should have stayed in the shadows. You heard very little about Tim during…
Democrats are reviving the authoritarian ideologies of history’s most oppressive regimes, once thought to be…
Across the country, left-wing activists are attempting to convert America’s state courts into left-wing policy…
For two decades, the Federal Reserve has behaved less like a central bank and more…
The Trump administration is investigating how organizations like “The TransLatin@ Coalition” use taxpayer dollars, according to…
New Jersey Democratic House candidate Adam Hamawy worked for an Al-Qaida-linked nonprofit in the 1990s…