I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will have executive time, participate in a tele-rally, travel to…
As the world moves deeper into the digital age, the Pentagon is building a new…
President Donald Trump frequently sparred with “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker about multiple topics…
Communists, Nazis, and Islam in America have overtaken and changed the Democrat Party, but many…
Democrats continue to promote policies that run counter to mainstream America’s views. Doubling down and…
Air raid sirens sounded Sunday night in Israel as Iranian ballistic missiles were intercepted by…