I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
President Donald Trump told reporters on Thursday that the strikes on the Iranian regime were…
The largest U.S. grid operator proposed cutting power to newcomers during periods of high demand…
The Virginia Supreme Court struck down the Democrats’ gerrymandering referendum in a Friday ruling. Virginia…
President Donald Trump announced that there will be a three-day ceasefire in the war between…
The United States Postal Service (USPS) closed comments Monday on a proposed rule that would…
South Carolina has a rare opportunity to lead. For the first time in decades, our…