I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will travel to Groton, Connecticut, where he will deliver the…
Cuba may have acquired small, portable and easy-to-operate suicide drones, the new deadly buzz heard…
A socialist group with ties to a China-based financier is setting up indoor hubs for…
A federal appellate court ruled that New York’s law banning firearms carrying under a so-called…
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul seems to be walking a tightrope on education reform. Last…
President Donald Trump endorsed Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Tuesday over incumbent Sen. John…