I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
A plurality of Democrats want their party to go further to the left on healthcare…
Americans’ confidence in the economy has dropped to a nearly four-year low, according to a…
Many pundits are predicting that the Democrats will enjoy huge successes in the November mid-term…
Elon Musk’s SpaceX filed to go public in what could become the largest initial public…
Democratic Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger is telling her fellow party members it is time to…
The House overwhelmingly passed a housing affordability bill Wednesday that would limit major investors from…