I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
The Supreme Court unanimously sided on Friday with major energy companies seeking to move environmental…
The U.S. military may be ramping up for a potential Cuba operation, multiple reports suggest.…
Maybe Trump Derangement Syndrome is a convenient excuse to overlook the years of Eric Swalwell…
Stanley Richards finished his sentence for robbery in 1991 and joined a leftist charity focused…
The Trump administration’s new Dietary Guidelines finally got alcohol right, treating grown adults like grown…
Donald Trump’s critics have a new line of attack (do these people ever take a…