I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
It's challenging enough to pay attention to political races in our home states, much less…
Provided that your basic life needs for shelter, food and clothing are being met, more…
Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will have executive time and participate in a series of…
The race between U.S. and China to powerful AI is a real thing, but we’re…
Spy scientists repeatedly concluded that a lab accident caused the COVID-19 pandemic but more senior…