I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Justice Clarence Thomas blasted the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday for blocking Florida’s lawsuit against…
A California state senator has cooked up a new scheme intended to make life difficult…
A federal panel on Tuesday blocked Alabama Republicans’ House map, ruling that the Supreme Court’s recent…
You expect Democrats to stab you in the front, but it’s the RINOs that will…
The U.S. is currently facing a continuously worsening fertility crisis, according to analysts. While the…
Liberal big cities and states have backed themselves into a corner with out-of-control spending for…