I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) president Stacy Davis Gates said on Monday that “all children belong…
The Trump administration is funding a project in Florida that seeks to turn an airfield…
Republican Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski toyed with the idea of caucusing with Democrats on Monday,…
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the entire federal district court of Maryland on Tuesday.…
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from withholding billions of dollars in…
A growing share of Americans are ditching the Democratic Party as it suffers one of…