I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
The U.S. has invited all NATO allies to join a Washington-led maritime security initiative in…
The CIA illegally surveilled its own intelligence community colleagues who were overseeing the agency’s clandestine…
A train collided with a septic truck on Thursday in Virginia, video shows. The crash…
It is laughable to see any member of Congress telling a reporter that there should…
The story plays out the same way virtually every time. Democrats, egged on by the…