I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
Democrats are again acting like they occupy the high moral ground of American politics. But…
A preliminary agreement between the U.S. and Iran may include a $300 billion reconstruction fund,…
Romania said a Russian drone crashed into an apartment building near its border with Ukraine…
Anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protesters blocked a truck driver from driving through the street Wednesday…
Chicago had its typical holiday weekend - 13 people were shot during Memorial Day weekend…
Ohio Republican Gov. Mike DeWine is pausing a tax break for data centers after it…