I suggest two tracks to determine who should retain security clearances:
First: Review and revoke all clearances as warranted by the conduct of the holder.
Second: Perform a cost-benefit assessment for all security clearances held by those who are no longer on the government’s payroll. That’s just good financial sense.
The first step will protect national security. The second step will save taxpayer dollars.
Critical question: If a person without a clearance will not consult with the President, what difference does possession of a clearance make?
Allegation: Many persons are monetizing their clearances. Why should taxpayers subsidize them?
An expert suggested to The Washington Post on Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s Lincoln Memorial…
Chinese government officials are working to shore up their country’s grip over the Panama Canal,…
Democratic Texas Senate nominee James Talarico attempted Wednesday to pivot away from his past controversial…
Contributions of aircraft, submarines, drones and ships from the U.S. military to NATO may be…
Leftists are planning an Oregon “strip club” event to raise money for a group supporting…
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Wednesday flamed detainees who launched a hunger…