In the Courts

Supreme Court Puts Limits On Police Entering Homes Without A Warrant

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday on when and if police can enter the homes of suspects they are pursuing without a warrant, according to court documents.

If a suspect enters a home and they are suspected of a misdemeanor, police cannot always enter the home without a warrant, the court ruled in Lange v. California. Although, the ruling does not provide definitive guidance about when they can enter a home when pursuing a misdemeanor suspect.

The court ruled that a fleeing misdemeanor does not always qualify as an “exigent circumstance.”

“The flight of a suspected misdemeanant does not always justify a warrantless entry into a home,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a majority opinion. “An officer must consider all the circumstances in a pursuit case to determine whether there is a law enforcement emergency. On many occasions, the officer will have good reason to enter — to prevent imminent harms of violence, destruction of evidence, or escape from the home. But when the officer has time to get a warrant, he must do so—even though the misdemeanant fled.”

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito said they believe a suspect’s choice to flee in and of itself should give police the ability to go after them into a home, according to the ruling.

“I would not override decades of guidance to law enforcement in favor of a new rule that provides no guidance at all,” Roberts wrote. “The Constitution does not demand this absurd and dangerous result.”

The Supreme Court ruling does not bar police from homes when chasing a misdemeanor suspect, but it does not give them free reign to enter either, Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center said, the Associated Press reported.

“The decision tells police to do what they always do, he said, which is ‘use your common sense, use your training,’ said Larry H. James, general counsel for the National Fraternal Order of Police, the AP reported. “When the situation warrants immediate action, take it. When it doesn’t, get a warrant.”

In a 1976 Supreme Court case, United States v. Santana, the body ruled that police in “hot pursuit” of a suspect believed to have committed a felony were allowed to enter a home without a warrant, while the current ruling addressed misdemeanors.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Kendall Tietz

Share
Published by
Kendall Tietz

Recent Posts

Updated: President Donald Trump’s Schedule for Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Schedule Summary: President Donald Trump will sign a bill into law and travel to Davos,…

7 hours ago

Federal Judges Take Over Hiring For Key DOJ Spot After Disqualifying Trump Attorney

Federal judges posted a job application online Tuesday seeking someone to take Lindsey Halligan’s place…

11 hours ago

‘I’ve Changed My Mind’ — Rand Paul Does Major About Face On Big Tech

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul pivoted his stance on Google and YouTube on Monday, writing…

11 hours ago

Gun Rights Attorney Reminds Sonia Sotomayor Hawaii Is Part Of United States

A gun rights attorney reminded Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday that Hawaii is part of…

11 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani Says He Wants ICE To Be Completely Abolished

Democratic New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani confirmed on Tuesday that he supports abolishing Immigration…

11 hours ago

Seattle Mayor Proudly Admits She Is Not Seeking Probe Into Somali Scammers

Democratic Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson told a reporter during a January interview that she was…

11 hours ago