In the Courts

Supreme Court Grants Review For Free Speech Case Involving ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark

The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a free speech case involving a trademark that harkens back to a crude joke Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio made at former President Donald Trump’s expense during the 2016 election.

The case, Vidal v. Elster, stems from a T-shirt made by Steve Elster with the words “Trump too small,” a reference to Rubio’s joke about Trump’s “small hands” during a campaign rally in 2016, where he told the crowd “you know what they say about guys with small hands.” The United States Patent & Trademark Office declined to register Elster’s mark under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act, which bans the registration of trademarks that include “a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent.”

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision in February 2022, finding the application of Section 2(c) to Elster’s mark “unconstitutionally restricts free speech in violation of the First Amendment.”

“The PTO’s refusal to register Elster’s mark cannot be sustained because the government does not have a privacy or publicity interest in restricting speech critical of government officials or public figures in the trademark context—at least absent actual malice, which is not alleged here,” the court found.

Ester stated during his registration request that he wanted to convey “that some features of President Trump and his policies are diminutive,” according to court documents. The back of the t-shirt states “Trump’s package is too small” along with a list of policy areas he is “small on,” including the environment, civil rights, immigrant rights, LGBTQ rights, workers’ rights, voting rights and affordable health care.

Ester argues in a brief filed with the Supreme Court that the statute “makes it virtually impossible to register a mark that expresses an opinion about a public figure—including a political message (as here) that is critical of the President of the United States.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Katelynn Richardson

Share
Published by
Katelynn Richardson

Recent Posts

Trump’s Big, Beautiful, Bill Scores Victory in Senate – Still Hard Road Ahead

The U.S. Senate voted to advance President Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill" to debate, clearing an…

8 hours ago

Trump Declares War On Deep State Leakers

The Trump administration is cracking down on government leakers and curbing the flow of classified…

10 hours ago

Alan Dershowitz Explains Why Trump Can Now Ignore Rogue Injunctions From Liberal Judges

Alan Dershowitz weighed in on Fox Business Friday on the ongoing battle between the executive…

10 hours ago

Hugh Hewitt Names Which City Would Get All Of NYC’s Banking And Finance If Mamdani Wins

Radio host Hugh Hewitt said Friday on Fox News’ “Hannity” that he believes Miami will…

10 hours ago

A Cornerstone Of The America First Mandate

The United States’ recent confrontations with Iran dominate the headlines, but the growing, if quieter,…

10 hours ago