In the Courts

Biden Judge Refuses To Let Trump Decide Who Should Have A Security Clearance

A federal judge reversed President Donald Trump’s decision on Tuesday to strip an attorney’s security clearance.

Attorney Mark Zaid, who represented the whistleblower whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky led to his first impeachment in 2019, sued to regain his clearance in May.

District Court Judge Amir Ali agreed with Zaid’s claim that his clearance was likely revoked as retribution for representing clients who complained about the government.

“But here, the summary revocation of Zaid’s security clearance was not based on any national security interest,” the judge wrote. “Instead, on this record, the government’s sole interest was retribution against an attorney for representing clients adverse to the government. That is not a legitimate governmental interest, and it cannot override the right of Zaid’s clients to their chosen counsel.”

Ali blocked White House and intelligence agency officials from giving effect to Trump’s decision. He put his order on hold until Jan. 13, 2026, to allow time for the government to appeal.

Zaid did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump included Zaid on a list of individuals in March who he deemed it was “no longer in the national interest” to allow access to classified information. The list featured Hillary Clinton, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Democrat lawyer Norman Eisen, among others.

Trump called Zaid a “sleazeball” who should be sued for treason in 2019. Zaid identifies as a political independent and has represented clients on all sides, including the Daily Caller and the Republican National Committee.

“I have gone out of my way constantly for 33 years not to be partisan,” Zaid said in a February interview with The Record. “And unfortunately the right and left wings, but particularly the right wing, doesn’t really understand what that terminology means — that like, you don’t have to like Donald Trump. And that doesn’t mean you’re being partisan.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Katelynn Richardson

Share
Published by
Katelynn Richardson

Recent Posts

Sen. John Kennedy Has Two Major Worries As Iran Conflict Continues

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said Friday that he is closely watching the economic impact of…

13 hours ago

US Gives OK To Buy Iranian Oil Already At Sea

The Trump administration temporarily lifted sanctions on Iranian oil Friday, allowing buyers to purchase shipments…

13 hours ago

Elon Musk Offers To Pay Salaries Of TSA Agents Working Through Government Shutdown

Tesla CEO Elon Musk volunteered Saturday to pay the salaries of federal airport security workers…

13 hours ago

Nancy Pelosi Explains the Democrat Game Plan 

The Democrats have two problems that are making a disaster of their messaging program. John…

13 hours ago

Are the Democrats Waiting for a Major Incident Before They Come to Their Senses

I have admitted my mistake or misjudgement enough times, but one more may be in…

13 hours ago