A Kamala Harris Presidency is the End of America as We have Known and Loved It

Everywhere I go, people … are worried about Kamala Harris. … And [they] should be.  She is [a] more militant left than Joe Biden, a machine-backed Californian politician who never deviates from the progressive line [all emphasis added].

Biden was a perfect storm of incompetence and befuddlement.  The corrupt corporate media continues to cover for him, but [his] record is dim.  Massive government spending, punishing price rises, dangerous collapse of national security due to an inexplicable open border policy, and disinterest abroad.

Kamala … is all San Francisco all the time.  … [Harris] is as ill-prepared for the [presidency] as any presidential candidate in history [emphasis added].  That’s [why] she does no meaningful interviews.  If Americans would actually start paying attention, they would collectively shudder.

But many voters will not step back and view the frightening reality.  All they want is a defeated and humiliated Donald Trump.  Very unsettling.

Bill O’Reilly, Oct. 4, 2024

[Kamala] Harris is a child of privilege born in Oakland in 1964. Her father is from Jamaica and her mother from India. Her mixed race father is a descendant of Jamaican plantation slave owners. She has less than half African ancestry. Her mother is from the rich class of India’s [brutal] caste system. Both were research scientists at the University of California at Berkeley. She grew up in a privileged neighbourhood.  [H]er family has no connection to the historical and cultural experiences of American Blacks who [endured] slavery and segregation.  … Her sister is Maya Harris, [former] MSNBC political analyst. Maya’s husband worked on the 1994 Biden Crime Bill that led to mass incarceration of 2.5 million blacks.

Conservapedia

[T]hat Harris is unpopular should [be] no great surprise, given that she somehow manages to combine into a single package a transparent insincerity, an unvarnished authoritarianism, and a tendency toward precisely the sort of self-satisfied progressivism that helped the Republicans to limit their losses at the last general election.  [H]er apologists … can pretend that the reaction to Harris is “gendered” or “systemic” or “inequitable” … [but] deep down they must know that … Harris is a phony.  … [T]hroughout her entire public career, almost nobody has … thought, “Yes, she’s the person we need to lead us.” Sure, she’s won a couple of elections. But even in deep blue California, she has struggled. 

National Review, May 19, 2021

[Kamala Harris’ VP pick Tim] Walz Makes the Case for the Most Anti-Free Speech Ticket in History …  [F]or the free speech community, the prospect of a Harris-Walz administration is chilling [emphasis added].  Harris and Walz are the dream team for the anti-free speech movement

 GWU Law Professor Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley, Oct. 4, 2024

We, uh, she [Kamala Harris] helped pass all the laws that are being employed now. She was a major player in everything we’ve done, … Her staff is interlocked with mine in … all the things we’re doing.

President Joe Biden, Oct. 6, 2024

One of the storylines the Democrat “News”-media Colluders (hereafter the DNC) have concocted to con the voters is that Kamala Harris is not really connected to the disastrous unpopular Biden-Harris administration.   Unfortunately, Harris has, during the last 3.7 years bragged about being a major part of Biden’s disastrous decisions,

Kamala Harris, who once boasted of being the “last person in the room” when President Biden finalized America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, blamed former president Donald Trump for the [Biden-Harris administration’s] botched evacuation …

The Washington Free Beacon, Sept. 10, 2024

Harris also broke the Senate tie in order to pass the disastrous “Inflation Reduction Act” that massively increased inflation.  This should not be a surprise since Biden later admitted that the “Inflation Reduction Act” was really not about reducing inflation but was about the pet “liberal” project on climate change.  Some have even suggested that Joe Biden, angered at being undemocratically dumped from the ticket, has been trying to sabotage Harris’ campaign by reminding people that she was a “full participant” in every disastrous thing he did.

In fact, Harris is much further left than the “befuddled” Biden.  She has promised to take people’s guns away in a mandatory gun buy-back program.  That’s tyranny. 

In an effort to defuse the claim that she wants to confiscate people’s guns, Harris, in the interview with her friend Oprah, stated that she owns a gun herself and, adding some unnecessary violent language, said that if someone breaks into her house “they’re getting shot.”  Imagine the DNC hysteria if Trump said that!  Unfortunately, Kamala’s own alleged gun ownership has nothing whatsoever to do with supporting the 2^nd Amendment.  No one ever said that the selfish elites are going to give up their own guns.  The worry has always been that the elites and the criminals will retain their guns but the peasants will be disarmed.  And she had a J.D. from her parent’s University of California system?

In response to the accusation that Harris stated support for the violent Black Lives Matter protests, the DNC has tried to defend her by claiming that she only stated support for the “protests,” not the violence.  This is comical.  It doesn’t matter how Harris describes the protests.  If they were in fact violent, and they were, and she states support for them, then he has in fact stated support for violence.   

Further, as even CNN admits, Harris has praised the “defund the police” movement and has said that “resources” need to be “redirected away” from the police.  However, support for defunding the police is quite unpopular, even among black Americans. 

Harris has also supported a “single payer” (that is government controlled) health care system, a ban on fracking, she has talked about “abolishing” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (and she wonders why illegals are storming across the border).

Although Harris talks about “saving our democracy,” she and her VP, Tim Walz, are among the most radical supporters of government censorship of “the indispensable right” of free speech, without which democracy cannot exist. 

Recently, she told 60 Minutes that Trump has “only taken questions from friendly interviewers” recently.  In fact, she is there describing herself.  She has not bothered to explain to the peasants why, in an election year, she has suddenly abandoned all her past extremist positions but rather is hiding from the public and only appearing in friendly venues.  By contrast, Trump has gone into one hostile interview and debate after another where he has been demonstrably misrepresented.  Can Kamala tell the truth about anything? 

Astonishingly, despite her attempt to distance herself from her past extremist positions, she told CNN’s Dana Bash that “My values have not changed.”  But her expressed values over decades have been anti-2^nd Amendment, anti-police, anti-fracking, anti-free speech, pro porous borders and for the green agenda that fueled the Biden-Harris inflation that crushed the middle and lower-class.  As O’Reilly says, that is “the frightening reality.” 

If Kamala cannot lower herself to explain to the peasants now, when she needs their votes, why her policies have changed even though her “values” allegedly have not, why should anyone think she would respect the voters after she is elected and can use government power to censor them and push them around? 

This is how a country slides into a leftist tyranny.

Agree/Disagree with the author(s)? Let them know in the comments below and be heard by 10’s of thousands of CDN readers each day!